Thursday, 19 November 2009
-
THE TAR SANDS AND THE ENVIRONMENT; DOES CANADA SET THE AGENDA OR WILL THE U.S. DETERMINE OUR FATE?
Even before acid rain, Canada and the United States have long been at odds over the issue of inter-continental pollution. The debilitating fact that our individual and shared industrial waste respects no physical boundary has become an increasingly destructive and contentious issue, which is matched only by the often impenetrable political boundaries which have prevented substantive policy initiatives from curbing the fundamentally devastating environmental impact this has wrought.
Chief among these transgressors are the Alberta tar sands.
Since 1966, development of these vast areas of petroleum manufacturing has gone full steam ahead, despite persistent and troubling data from environmental protection groups that the massively intrusive and destructive footprint of this endeavour has had disastrously long term effects on native plant, animal and human life in the region and beyond.
Centered in Canada’s western province of Alberta, the tar sands, or oil sands industry has been an unquestionable boon for the region, producing tens of thousands of jobs and generating billions of dollars of revenue.
Yet equally indisputable has been the enormous environmental impact this has created, a direct result of the tremendously destructive, long lasting effects of the process.
The term ‘tar sands’ refers to a combination of water, sand, clay and bitumen, which is a thick, black, sticky oil compound, that must be removed from the soil before being processed into commercial grade oil. This is achieved by two methods which both involve extraction of the raw materials and then separating and refining them into a viable and highly profitable product. Both the extraction and separation stages involve not only tremendous costs but serious environmental impact as well.
Extracting the bitumen can be done in two ways; the first method is known as ‘open pit mining’ or ‘strip mining.’ This entails vast tracts of land literally being scraped clean in order to dig out the precious bitumen, leaving the area completely devoid of animal and plant life to a depth of 60 meters or more. Critics have decried this technique as nothing short of environmental rape, and it’s impossible to see an open pit mining operation and not get a sense of horror at the sight of an enormous gaping wound in the Earth, dotted with gigantic extractors and dump trucks running 24/7/365 for the express purpose of making money.
If the bitumen is embedded too deeply in the soil for open pit mining, an alternate technique is to inject chemically laced steam into the ground in order to soften and melt the bitumen and separate it from the sand and then pump it to the surface. The resulting water vapor released into the soil and air is extremely toxic even prior to the bitumen being treated with a variety of additional chemicals before finally piping it to a refinery.
Both methods disgorge huge volumes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, greatly contributing to global climate change.
Aboriginal peoples in the Tabasco River basin, the main area of production for the Alberta tar sands industry, have long cited increasingly disturbing statistics for elevated levels of toxins in the soil and air which have contributed to rising rates of cancer in their communities, and for the permanent loss of indigenous animal and plant species. Native groups have consistently received assurances from the mining and petroleum industries that they take great care to ensure their practices are as environmentally sensitive as possible, and that any impact to the environment is merely temporary.
Working in conjunction with a succession of provincial governments, these industries have spent vast sums in order to revitalize and reclaim the land they have mined, but to date, of the tens of thousands of square kilometers of land damaged by tar sands operations, less than 2% of the area has been cleansed and environmentally refurbished.
The effects of refining the extracted bitumen are of equal concern. Once the raw material reaches the refinery, it is subjected to further chemical treatments to purify and the bitumen into oil. The resulting runoff waste material is often pumped into what are known as ‘toxic lakes;’ vast pits of chemically noxious pools which simply lay open in the environment collecting millions of litres of hazardous liquids.
It has been estimated that the production of tar sand or ‘heavy’ oil is over three times more environmentally damaging as the production of light, crude oil.
Then there is the matter of the enormous expense of producing oil from tar sands. Whereas it costs as little as $5 per barrel to produce crude oil in the Middle East, or $15 per barrel from the Gulf of Mexico, it costs as much as $25 per barrel from oil sands production, which includes the cost of extraction and refinement. With a barrel of oil currently priced at $80 per barrel however, this still allows for a considerable profit margin.
The Alberta tar sands deposits have been conservatively projected to contain as much as 300 billion barrels, which makes the financial incentive for the government impossible to ignore, no matter the environmental costs to the region.
Premier Ed Stelmach and his Environment Minister Rob Renner have recently suggested that they are awaiting a decision by their American counterparts as to what emissions caps should be adopted in order to stem the growing tide of environmental concerns regarding the tar sands industry, before setting their own agenda on balancing the enormous profits driven by production versus the serious implications of long term damage to the region and its inhabitants.
This position has drawn harsh criticism for lacking any perceived independence relating to Alberta’s (and by extension Canada’s) interest or ability to monitor and address its own environmental concerns, and for the very real sense it displays that we are still willing to allow the United States to set the parameters for what drives environmental policy; profit or pragmatism.
Canada can either be a leader when it comes to sound environmental practices, setting an exemplary mark for others to strive for, or it can be merely a follower of the United States’ model, which has been consistently resistant to the idea of hindering industries from producing wealth, no matter how unsound and potentially dangerous the ramifications of that policy have proven to be.
In a world increasingly concerned about the long term environmental impact of the petroleum industry and the very need for our perpetual reliance on oil itself, this seems to be a choice which should be easy to make, but with such vast sums of money in the equation, it appears the final decision will have very little to do with altruism.
Copyright JQM 2009
Monday, 16 November 2009
-
PEOPLE WHOSE CAREERS I JUST DON’T UNDERSTAND
Don’t get me wrong here; if anyone can produce a living with any degree of longevity without displaying a hint of legitimate talent for their chosen field, or have simply created a career by cobbling together support or popularity that earns them a regular paycheck, that certainly takes some doing. However, in the case of the following individuals, my capacity to recognize the validity of their livelihoods as anything but mystifying is based solely on my appraisal of their extremely limited attributes, and a healthy skepticism in the bewildering and dubious justification for their continued aptitude to make money the way they do.VANNA WHITE AND PAT SAJAK
Vanna’s first appearance on Wheel of Fortune, December 13, 1982
She’s obviously a very attractive woman, seems sincerely pleasant, and has managed to parlay the ability to use her hands to turn large Scrabble tiles in one direction into a low grade celebrity career, which is equal parts admirable and astonishing. I will say this for her, she understands her place in this world, and it’s firmly planted on the set of the hugely popular game show ‘Wheel of Fortune.’
(Pat Sajak lives out his fantasy on what he assumed to be his last Wheel of Fortune before his ill fated late night talk show debut.)
This is in stark contrast to her utterly bland co-worker Pat Sajak, who for some unfathomable reason, decided his capacity to ask pre-scripted questions based on short anecdotes penned by the show’s contestants, somehow qualified him to host his own short lived late night talk show, which ran from January 9, 1989 until April 13, 1990. The resulting ratings bomb brought Pat back to Earth from the giddy heights of show biz like an obese albatross with a broken wing, and he’s worn a contemptuous, defeated look on his face ever since, reading clues like ‘We’re looking for a type of circus freak,’ as though he were describing a particularly grievous bowel movement. Here’s a tip Pat; be like Vanna. She knows without this show she would be back to hosting professional Tupperware parties, and that you ‘d be back managing your hometown bowling alley. They both perfectly embody the sentiment of know your limits. Vanna does so with some grace however, while Pat was forced to see what it’s like to grab the brass ring with nothing but his elbow.
(CBS promo for the Pat Sajak show.)
WEIRD AL YANKOVIC
Al Yankovic on ‘Circus of the Stars’ from 1993
Okay, this guy is actually a decent accordion player, and granted has a sense of humor, but his stupefying ability to manufacture a career out of bastardizing song lyrics in the same way my friends and I did during grade 4 lunch hours while bored out of our skulls is just not something anyone would have believed possible as a career for a grown ass man. Just the titles of his ‘hit’ songs make me want to punch his head in, they are so reminiscent of being a 9 year old and thinking that lyrics such as ‘Like a surgeon’ was the funniest damn thing in the world, and therein lies the rub; they are funny TO A 9 YEAR OLD. How in the name of teeth gnashing irony this kind of ‘songwriting’ could have ever turned into a livelihood for an adult is living proof that the Western world is utterly devoid of culture and sanity. I need only point to the Kenny G haircut to suggest that this guy’s 15 minutes should have been over 25 years ago.
RUSH LIMBAUGH / BILL O’REILLY / ANN COULTER / SEAN HANNITY / GLENN BECK / BILL KRISTOL / MICHELLE MALKIN
I have lumped them all into one giant mass of fetid ectoplasm because they have literally morphed into an indistinguishable mass of monumentally unpleasant boorishness. Speaking hate to the masses of Twinkie engorged mental midgets is no way for a self respecting human being to draw a paycheque. It’s as though they all answered the question ‘What do you want to be when you grow up,’ with ‘The most vile, ill-informed, divisive, money grubbing, hate filled bigot that can influence millions of knuckle dragging proto-simians who would rather eat their own bile than read a book about politics or history or other cultures, because as an American, it’s my God given right to castigate anyone who doesn’t look, think or act like my heroes from the privileged, all Caucasian world of the 1930’s.’ Talk about lowballing it.
I leave them to hang themselves with their own words.
JESSICA AND ASHLEE SIMPSON
Where do I start? Jessica Simpson seems to be on a singular mission to figuratively embody every facet of every dumb blonde joke ever written. Not content to portray herself as a witless and crass beer belching bimbo during her excruciating reality series ‘Newlyweds: Nick and Jessica,’ which chronicled the impending breakdown of her short lived marriage to perpetually embarrassed husband Nick Lachay, JS went on to curse the career of NFL quarterback Tony Romo by insisting that the presence of 85 television cameras that followed their relationship was just the price of ‘fame.’ What a surprise to find that VH1 is airing what they call a ‘documentary’ series about her entitled ‘The Price of Beauty.’ One can only assume this will constitute a stunningly revealing behind the scenes look at how much it costs to desperately try and seem viable to a world that has long ago lost interest in the day to day existence of a pretty but mindless denizen of a pseudo celebrity wasteland culture.
Ashlee Simpson is just proof of what to expect when the ambitious sibling of a non talent pushes their way onto the big stage simply by virtue of their DNA; hilarity ensues.
LARRY KING
Once thought of as the premier interviewer on syndicated radio, Larry and his shoulder pads have been a mainstay on CNN for years now, and has been making it clear almost as long that a senior citizen with a bizarre history of collecting and discarding trophy wives like dime store figurines, has been seamlessly phoning it in for years. Relying on his legions of underlings to provide him with a one page synopsis on the careers and biographies of his guests, this amounts to Larry doing no research but asking them poignant questions such as, ‘So what did you think about the Iraq War? Good, bad, a little inconvenient for shopping, or what?’
THE HOGANS
Okay, the Hulkster had his time under the big top, as any self respecting steroid freak with 21 inch guns who loves to wear a Speedo and bounce off sweaty ex football has beens should. What in the name of Sweet Daddy Siki makes anyone believe this guy and his sorry ass family of miscreants should now be the stars of their own reality show that exploits the notion that people will watch just about any train wreck if it’s on three times a day in immediate syndication? Not content to share the glare of big daddy’s spotlight, Brooke Hogan is now laboring under the impression she’s got what it takes to warrant her own 24 hour a day hubriscam to share her insights and ‘talents’ with the rest of the universe. In a perfect world, they would all spontaneously combust for the good of humanity.
Brooke Hogan waxes poetic.
Copyright JQM 2009
Wednesday, 11 November 2009
-
TECHNOLOGY MY YOUTH PROMISED ME BY NOW, BUT I’M STILL WAITING DAMMIT
In the far off land of my youth, once known as the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, the future was a magical place of wondrous gadgets and conveniences that would make 2001: A Space Odyssey look like a bad Buck Rogers serial from the 1930’s.
There was to be no end to the technological marvels that would soon transform our entire way of life, and make the primitive world we had grown up in seem as distant and archaic as steamships and telegrams.
But we were lied to. Many of the coolest and most longed for advances never materialized, leaving an entire generation to bemoan their absence.
They include:
THE PERSONAL JETPACK
Made famous in the 1965 James Bond film ‘Thunderball,’ this has been every kid’s preferred Christmas present ever since. The Segway may seem more practical, but no other personal transportation device has EVER been as cool as this space age dream machine
There was even a promotional film made in the late ‘60’s suggesting this thing was just waiting for us around the corner:
Nearly 50 years later and you still can’t find this freaking thing even at a Hyundai dealership; let’s get on this people, we’ve been to the moon and back for God’s sake.
THE JETSON’S HOVERCAR
On top of having one of the most beloved and catchiest theme songs in the history of cartoons, George Jetson’s hovercar has been the wetdream of car fanatics young and old since the series debuted in 1962. The idea of whizzing around in a flying car has never stopped enthralling all of us who grew up in the suburbs with commuting as a way of life. Plus, Jane his wife was HOT; don't even get me started on Rastro.
The Moller M400 Skycar is as close as we’ve come.
TELEPORTERS
Who among us hasn’t longed for the day when science allowed for every molecule of our bodies to be broken down into a digitized stream of binary code which can then be sent vast distances through space and time to be reconstituted into a fully realized biological creature? If I can download porn onto a cellphone, why can’t I damn well get this too? As long as we take a can of RAID with us, I don’t see the problem.
We just aren’t moving fast enough here.
THE STAR TREK FOOD REPLICATOR
Ummm…..yeah……is it SO hard to simply make a device that takes any ol’ atom you can find and then turns it into a gourmet 5 course meal simply by asking for it? I mean seriously; they’ve had microwave ovens forever and pop rocks for like 30 years already, what the Hell?
Why does it feel like this is the closest we’ll ever get?
UNDERWATER HOUSES
The idea of swimming home after a hard day at the office to a fabulous underwater pad complete with Janet Leigh and Richard Dreyfuss simply never loses its appeal. Why this seems impractical in an age where homes are built prefab out of everything from old car tires to reprocessed plastic bottles is beyond me. I WANT MY JANET LEIGH; Dreyfuss, meh, not so much, but that swinging music, man that sounds!
Leave it to Dubai to try and get this trend going; you’ll never again have to ask if the room comes with a view, or if it costs 11 billion oil dollars just to get a reservation.
ANDROIDS / ROBOTS
Do I even have to say how cool it would be to have these things doing our bidding for us? How long have we been promised a life of idle pleasure while these mechanical leisure givers sit at our beck and call? This isn’t even funny anymore; they don’t even have to look like us, just build them already! In the name of God I'm still cooking for myself!
Okayyyyy……..I MAY want them to look like us…..
HOVERBOARDS
MCFLYYYYYY! Hell yeah he was Mcflying! With one of these badboys, the sky was the limit. When Back to the Future part 2 premiered in 1989, this funky ass future toy was all anyone was talking about. 1989 PEOPLE! What’s the delay already? At this rate, by the time they invent these, we'll already have HoverFeet.
C’mon now; this giant vacuum cleaner thingy is as close as we get? Whatchu talkin’ ‘bout Willis?
Copyright JQM 2009
Tuesday, 10 November 2009
-
CANADA’S TOP COMMANDER VOICES CONCERNS ABOUT THE AFGHAN MISSION

Brigadier-General Jonathan Vance, Canada’s commander in Afghanistan, has been the most recent high level official to state publicly what many NATO military and political leaders are increasingly recognizing as a primary obstacle to success in the war torn country.
“The international community is going to demand honesty, integrity and good performance from all levels of government or we won’t stay. We have lost too many soldiers and spent too much of our people’s money to stay if there is not honest co-operation. Our public accepts us here and is deciding right now whether we will stay. Canadians, Americans, the British, everyone is wondering whether it is worth it to stay.”
Vance made his comments during his final tour of Kandahar province, meeting with local tribal elders on the eve of his departure as Canada’s top commander in Afghanistan, following his ten month tenure.
His dire warning comes on the heels of similar statements delivered to Afghan president Hamid Karzai, in the aftermath of the election debacle which saw widespread fraud allegations lead to a potential second round of voting, only to have the runoff vote halted at the last moment by the unexpected withdrawal of Karzai’s main challenger, Dr. Abdullah Abdullah.
Abdullah had wanted major changes made to the makeup of the election monitoring committee, whom he accused of being loyal to Karzai, and thus responsible for much of the vote tampering, as well as some of the procedural processes which he also saw as flawed. When his demands were rejected, he announced his withdrawal from the runoff process in protest, and paved the way for Karzai to be returned to power, albeit under a cloud of suspicion.
Although this outcome provided some relief among NATO countries whose military deployments have been heavily debated in recent months, particularly in the United States as president Barack Obama has been weighing his decision to escalate his nation’s armed forces in Afghanistan depending on the outcome of the Afghan election, the controversy surrounding Karzai’s government has certainly not abated as a result of the voting fiasco.
In fact, Brig-Gen. Vance is in the rare position of having the opportunity to voice the private concerns of many NATO military and diplomatic personnel, and the growing numbers of their constituents for whom the Afghan mission has become largely untenable.
“I think we have achieved everything, tactically, that we set out to. I feel that the coalition is going to achieve great things. More Afghans are going to be safe and the country is going to begin to recover,” said Vance, when asked if success was still possible in Afghanistan. “What I am hoping for is a political environment where there is the courage to govern correctly and to take responsibility for the insurgency. I was hoping that post-election there would be a real surge of political renewal, but that is still a question mark.”
NATO is seeing a disturbing shift in support among its domestic populations, who are finding it increasingly difficult to define ‘victory’ while the Afghan government continues to present itself as incapable of battling corruption, internal strife and the resurgent narcotics trade, not to mention the Taliban.
Hamid Karzai has been anything but effective or popular as a leader, as the recent election proved starkly. The result has been a steady upswing in the belief that the efforts of Western military involvement will be largely inconclusive in the face of the enormous challenges facing the Afghan people.
General Vance, while trying to strike a more optimistic chord, seemed only to echo the vast disparities between the long term goals of the military mission in Afghanistan, and the harsh realities;
“There are still many years before Afghanistan can stand up on its own, but it is achievable,” he said. “Not everything needs to be done in the next year and a half but we need to demonstrate clear and decisive progress in the districts and this must be connected to progress at the provincial and national levels. We are going to get to the zenith of the tactical effect in 12 to 18 months. But if we have tactical success absent a healthy governing environment, it will be much harder for Afghanistan to rally. It is important that leaders at all levels here are seized by this matter. Our tolerance to act here if we are without a solid, altruistic partner would be in jeopardy."
After 8 years of a grueling ground and air offensive, NATO is in the uncomfortable position of having to admit to very limited gains in the course of the war, and that its partnership with an Afghan government held in suspicion and contempt by its own people and much of the rest of the world, has not strengthened anyone’s conviction that the necessary elements are in place to achieve success, however that is defined.
With president Obama appearing set to authorize an additional 30,000+ American troops to the battlefields of Afghanistan, it appears that Gen. Vance’s prediction of a further 12 to 18 months of military engagement might be simply wishful thinking.
More’s the pity.
Copyright JQM 2009
Thursday, 05 November 2009
-
H1N1 TESTS GOVERNMENT’S READINESS AND CANADIAN’S PATIENCE
The Canadian government’s response to the H1N1 virus has been widely criticized for its perceived lack of foresight regarding its ability to inform and inoculate an increasingly frightened public.
Although the actual logistics of providing the vaccine are largely being seen to by individual provincial health services, Steven Harpers’ Conservative government has borne the brunt of attacks about their level of preparedness in managing what the World Health Organization has been calling a global pandemic of so called ‘swine flu’ since August 29, 2009.
On October 21, 2009, Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq and Canada’s chief public health officer Dr. David Butler-Jones hosted a joint press conference in Ottawa to urge all Canadians to ward against this new, highly virulent and potentially deadly strain of influenza.
"I'm happy to say that today Health Canada has authorized the H1N1 flu virus vaccine," said a reassuring Aglukkaq, “This is a milestone in our efforts to fight H1N1 flu virus."
However this did little to allay fears by skeptics that the drug was not being subjected to the same degree of safeguards expected of other vaccines. The reality is that the H1N1 vaccine has been developed in exactly the same manner that all seasonal vaccines have been for the past 60 years; the virus is grown in chicken eggs, purified, and then treated with a chemical agent which inactivates the strain.
During questioning, Aglukkaq later admitted that although the vaccine had passed Health Canada’s preliminary testing, the drug had not yet completed clinical trials in Canada, which according to the WHO’s website, “Previous influenza vaccines for the southern and northern hemispheres, including that for the 2009/2010 flu season, are ineffective against the new strain. It could take several months to develop, manufacture, and distribute a new vaccine.”
(http://swinefluscare.info/tag/h1ni#Vaccines_and_antiviral_treatments)
It’s worth noting that this is well within normal vaccine production and distribution timeframes, particularly for a viral strain whose first cases were only diagnosed in September 2008. In the following year, the swine flu threat has been closely monitored worldwide, prompting the WHO to raise its pandemic warning to their second highest level of 5 in April/09. This meant that the WHO considered the threat of a pandemic to be "imminent, and that human-to-human transmission cases have been recorded in multiple countries.”
(http://swinefluscare.info/tag/h1ni#First_diagnosis)
Both Aglukkaq and Butler-Jones emphasized that the vaccines should be prioritized to initially inoculate those Canadians deemed most at risk of contracting the virus, which included children under 5 (with those under 2 years of age especially vulnerable), people 65 or older, pregnant women, health care workers, people living in remote areas and Canadians with underlying medical issues, particularly respiratory ailments.
This brought about fresh concerns about the contents of the vaccine. The current form available in Canada is one which contains an ‘adjuvant.’ Adjutants are chemical compounds added to vaccines to stimulate or boost the immune system, most commonly used when there is a limited supply of the antigen (the agent which when introduced into the body, stimulates the production of an antibody), or when the vaccine itself does not produce an effective or sufficient antibody response.
GlaxoSmithKline, the pharmaceutical company that produces the vaccine, has a contract with the Canadian government to manufacture 50 million doses from its facility in Quebec City.
Canada has ordered nearly 2 million doses of the H1N1 vaccine to be manufactured without the adjuvant specifically for pregnant women and young children, because of the lack of testing data on reactions to the drug among those high risk groups.
This fuelled a public outcry as to why the Harper government was authorizing the use of the adjuvant containing vaccine for high risk groups such as young children and pregnant women, without adequate information regarding the safety of the drug on those most vulnerable groups.
The government later amended its guideline to suggest that the adjuvant form of the vaccine was in fact safe for pregnant women past the 20 week period of their first term.
Many in the medical profession have also expressed concern about the level of information they have received in advance of the roll out of the vaccination program. Doctors and nurses across the country have complained that they have not been provided with adequate information to relay to their patients about when and where to receive the shots, and have been forced to rely on the Health Canada website for what news they can confirm for the benefit of their patients. Hospitals and health clinics have been disappointed in the lack of access to up to date information regarding what is being called the largest mass inoculation program in Canada’s history.
Harper himself only added to the frustration and confusion when asked directly at an October 14 press conference if and when he would himself be immunized; "My plan, if it's generally recommended for people to get the vaccine, my plan is to get the vaccine. But as yet, of course, we haven't actually made a final decision or set a date. We're, as you know, right now, waiting [for] final approval of the vaccine, but we expect that imminently." Harper’s aides later clarified that what the P.M. meant was that he would get the vaccine when it was approved by Health Canada, not if or when it was recommended. That approval subsequently followed a week later.
Despite Health Canada’s assurances that adequate volumes of the drug would be available for the first week in November, the dire warnings about the effects of the virus, as well as the growing numbers of casualties (a total of 101 as of November 3, 2009), has prompted larger than expected crowds of Canadians anxious to receive it, with people waiting from between 2 to 6 hours in some cases due to the huge lineups at clinics and health centers across the country.
Add to that the recent admission by Dr. Butler-Jones that GlaxoSmithKline has shipped excess quantities of the antigen, the main ingredient of the vaccine, to nations overseas that require it. This comes on the heels of the embarrassing news that many flu clinics across Canada have thus far received so few quantities of the vaccine, that they have to shut their doors until additional supplies become available. Butler-Jones was adamant that the antigens being shipped out of Canada would in no way impact on Health Canada’s ability to provide the vaccine to everyone in the country who wants or needs it.
"There has been bulk vaccine that we're not able to actually fill here so that has been exported," he said. "But all of the vaccine that we can fill in Canada has stayed and will stay in Canada until our immunization is complete."
Compounding many Canadian’s frustration is the controversial revelation that professional sports teams from the NHL, the Calgary Flames and the Toronto Maple Leafs, as well as Toronto’s NBA franchise Raptors, have this week jumped the queues and received the vaccine, while thousands of high priority Canadians continue to wait for hours in mass lineups to receive theirs.
All in all it would be difficult to ignore the growing sense of doubt in the minds of many Canadians as to how well their government is being seen to have dealt with the issue of H1N1 at the start of the seasonal flu season.
The next month should be the last grace period Mr. Harper may enjoy if he and his government cannot convince Canadians that they have met the challenges of swine flu in a timely and effective manner.
Copyright JQM 2009
Wednesday, 28 October 2009
-
THE MOST ANNOYING TRENDS OF THE NEW MILLENIUM
It might be just me, but as I get older I find myself growing increasingly irritated by what seems to be ever more obvious attempts to turn everything on Earth into a pre-packaged product composed almost entirely of flash over substance. It’s all filler and no nutrients, like giant marshmallow sandwiches that look good, but are nothing more than empty, sugary fluff.These then are a few of my least favorite things that are turning the first decade of the 21st century into the flotsam and jetsam millennium:
VAMPIRES
WTF is up with all this Vampire shiite? They are literally EVERYWHERE in popular culture. Can anyone explain to me why people under the age of 20 are obsessed with the entirely fictitious idea of demonic, blood suckers torn from the pages of Tiger Beat magazine and thrust into the local High School to bewitch the likes of jocks, cheerleaders and brainiacs on Main streets across the Western world? This guy Pattinson looks like he could actually use some real blood in his anemic body; his hair looks healthier than he does. Are teens so bored and dismissive of real life that they would rather retreat into a fantasy world where at least you know what to expect from the brooding new kid with the fangs? Enough already.
TWITTER
This has got to be the most unnecessary of all the formulaic new media available 24/7 to a fad obsessed culture. Not content to have email, instant messaging and text, the invasive geniuses at TWITTER now provide the average person with the ability to project their averageness, or the newest celebrity their celebritiness to the entire planet if need be, updating whole communities simultaneously about the slightest minutiae of their every waking moment. Imagine going a full hour without knowing if Paris Hilton was stepping out of a cab, or if Shia LaBeouf got a new haircut, or if your spouse was eating a healthy lunch and possibly farting afterward, all in real time? The very idea makes me want to jump on my BlackBerry and TWITTER my anxiety about even considering missing all that important crap that makes me feel so important because I can live vicariously through all these important people who make life so important with their important crap.
MILEY CYRUS
For the love of God, what makes this young woman and her followers believe she is the second coming of Jesus? You cannot turn on the television or the computer without being bombarded by an endless stream of vapid information about this endlessly vacuous and completely manufactured individual. A vastly popular television show, countless concert tours, a movie and truly Herculean volumes of gossip have yet to inspire me to believe this 15 year old daughter of a one hit wonder country musician whose fame ended just as Miley was conceived, has even a shred of legitimate talent. The most one can claim is that she is the new Britney Spears; who would want to aspire to anything more than that?
BRITNEY SPEARS
The one who set the mold for young, immensely popular ‘celebrities’ whose entire persona is based on the idea that if you manage to get your image broadcast virtually 24 hours a day, no one will notice that you actually have no credible attributes to validate your status as a ‘star,’ and that your life is really nothing more than a spectacular train wreck with designer clothes. The best that can be said about BS is that she’s the old Miley Cyrus, but with more plastic surgery and offspring, both of which are merely tax deductible accessories for her.
ADOLESCENT INTERNET WHORES
These desperate, attention seeking teens fall into two categories; males and females. The male version generally consists of 14 to 18 year olds picking fights with one another and filming the entire melee on their cellphones before uploading it to UTube or EBaumsWorld or other similar websites that cater to the basest instincts fueling puerile, adolescent fantasies of wannabe gangbangers, whose idea of fun is to corner someone and beat the crap out of them while their buddies look on approvingly and often join in; most disturbing is the growing number of teen girls who find this equally entertaining. The female version is generally comprised of young girls 13 to 19 years of age whose idea of a good time is to get together in groups of from 3 to 10 individuals, take off their clothes and drink themselves into a super sexy stupor that allows them to dance like seasoned strippers in lingerie designed for adult women in front of a webcam. and then upload the video onto the internet as fast as possible, thus ensuring the onset of premature heart attacks and permanent facial tics for fathers all over the world.
Just two words of advice to both versions; aim higher.
REALITY SHOWS
Years ago while watching one of the first Survivor episodes, which incidentally was my last episode, I remarked to my friends in attendance that if this trend continued, it wouldn’t be long before the FOX network would feature such stirring TV fare as ‘Virgins Vs. Volcanoes!’ or ‘Who Wants to Marry My Dead Gay Dad? Everyone laughed and thought I was just being typically cynical. I was, but I was also perfectly serious. In the ensuing decade, there has been absolutely nothing to suggest that my prediction won’t eventually come true. ‘Bubble Boy’ certainly didn’t convince me that people aren't now willing to do ANYTHING, including breaking the law, for the chance to show the entire universe just how messed up they are in between commercials for male erectile dysfunction and female condoms.
CELLPHONES
I’ve written about this before, but the wholly ubiquitous nature of these handheld devices, and their increasingly sophisticated designs have made them more common than a wristwatch and more annoying than Nigerian Princes who send emails calling you ‘Dear Lovely One.’ If you threatened to restrict the use of these bloody things for one day from the average teenager, they would first break out in a cold sweat, then club you over the head with their 45 pound backpack and push you under the wheels of the nearest SUV. The entire thing would be recorded and on UTube before your body entered rigor mortis. This is what happens when you give a 14 year old a $500 IPhone as a birthday present because ‘Everyone else in school has one!’ Don’t be surprised to find homemade fight videos or exotic dancing on the device should your son or daughter be foolish enough to leave it where you might find it; and that’s if you can crack their security password because they aren’t stupid enough to let their parents find out what they’ve really been doing with the damn thing.
Please let me know if I've missed anything truly cringe-worthy.
Copyright JQM 2009
Monday, 26 October 2009
-
THE GREAT HANDSET DEBATE; PORTABLE CONNECTIVITY OR ENSLAVEMENT?
I’ll just start out by saying that I’m a great believer in the some of advancements inherent in technology, few could argue that developments in communications, medicine, science and even lowly entertainment haven't seen huge leaps forward due to the insatiable genius of human imagination.
It’s wise to remember however, that too much of anything, even technology, is not necessarily a good thing.
The most obvious point of contention is the ubiquitous cellphone.
Over 30 years ago, at the dawn of the handset age, cellphones were big, blocky, cumbersome devices that looked strikingly similar to the army combat radio sets you saw in old black and white war films.
They literally weighed about 8 pounds, required a huge battery and charger that gave about 30 minutes of air time, and were originally used exclusively by men in their early 40’s with open neck shirts, tons of gold chains, a tanning bed glow of unnatural orange, and vanity plates that said things like ‘STUD4U.’
No one, and I mean NO ONE ever thought they would become the must have accessory for everyone from Grandma to preschoolers.
People laugh now when you say, as I do, that I don’t use a cellphone. I have one, bought it ten years ago when I was moving far too frequently, but once I got a landline, I have never used the damn thing since.
Now of course, it’s a dinosaur, because I didn’t need it to do anything but make and receive phone calls, so it can’t surf the web, there are no apps for it that allow me to see through clothing, and it won’t live stream the finest Mongolian television dramas via satellite onto its half inch screen.
For all intents and purposes, it’s a museum piece, along with my original Atari 2600 game console from 1976, my collection of 1980’s cassette tapes and my pleather vest from 1991.
I recently worked for a time at a large communications corporation here in Toronto, (whose name, were I foolhardy enough to mention it, would cause me to be instantly vaporized by the confidentiality chip they secretly implanted during my training) for their wireless sales and support team; in other words, a phone drone.
It was then I realized just how far removed I was from what everyone under 40 takes for granted; people simply cannot live without these devices.
I was older than nearly everyone in my hiring and training class, and was the only one who didn’t have or use a cellphone.
Virtually everyone else had a Blackberry or an IPhone. After spending the entire day with a headset practicing customer scenarios with one another, the first thing everyone would do on a break would be to check their messages, emails, alerts, instant messages and twitters, and then make as many phone calls as possible in 15 minutes or a half hour lunch, and then return to our training session, put back on their headsets, and be on the phones again for the rest of the day.
I found it mind boggling.
After a few weeks, I finally asked one of my new friends, ‘What would happen to you if I threw your IPhone out that window?’
Without even looking up from texting someone, he said, ‘I would fucking throw you out the window.’
These devices have made people so reliant on them, that most people cannot even conceive of a world where they are out of touch with them for anything more than a few hours.
I remember a time when the only phone calls you could make outside of your home was via a payphone; do these even exist anymore? Has anyone under the age of 25 ever seen or used one?
Now of course, the use of these devices anywhere and everywhere is leading to a rising concern that there are places they simply shouldn’t be tolerated, like at the wheel of a moving vehicle.
If these laws are enacted to prohibit people from texting and emailing while driving, this is only the first step. I personally would like to have them banned even if you are a PASSENGER in a moving vehicle; am I the only one who doesn’t want to hear a14 year old talk in excruciating detail about which Jonas brother is hotter, or listen to a middle aged man bitch about why the Grossman account is worth saving, or a senior citizen complain about how her daughter’s PAP smear ‘wasn’t right’ while on a 20 minute bus ride?
The law can’t go far enough to get these people and their devices to shut up in a movie theater, the line at the grocery checkout or in a waiting room or a funeral.
Just how important do people think they are that they have to be in constant contact with their little world of self absorption, or go even further in their desire to share the minutiae of their interactions with the rest of humanity?
I ask you; how long could you go without having the use of your handheld device, or would you rather contemplate barbecuing and eating your own hand before even considering turning it off or leaving it at home?
Copyright JQM 2009
Thursday, 22 October 2009
-
PRIME MINISTER STEPHEN HARPER AND CANADIAN CONTENT
It’s been a fascinating month of revelations for Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, to say the least.
On October 3, Harper drew a standing ovation for his performance with famed cellist YoYo Ma at the black tie event for the National Arts Centre gala.
This yearly event is a showcase for the rich and powerful elite in Ottawa society, with all the pomp and ceremony that such a prestigious, invitation only soiree commands.
One would think that should the Prime Minister wish to entertain the assembled dignitaries, his preference might run to light classical music, or perhaps nothing more radical than Michael Buble
Which only made his choice of The Beatles’ “With a Little Help From My Friends” all the more unexpected.
Notwithstanding the obviously smirk worthy enjoyment in listening to the normally staid and politically correct PM uttering the words ‘I get high with a little help from my friends’ multiple times, there was rightfully no mention in any reporting of the impromptu concert regarding the lack of Canadian song content for Harpers’ foray into the heady world of show business.
After all, what proud Canadian would legitimately admit any misgivings about The Beatles? Their message of peace, love and rock ‘n roll is universally appealing and the furthest thing in the world from politically charged.
Nonetheless, I think I speak for the vast majority of the population who were both duly impressed with Harper’s singing and piano skills, and equally surprised at his choice of such a liberal, one might even say ‘Hippy’ tune, complete with an overt drug reference and meme of togetherness and brotherhood.
It was akin to having John Diefenbaker appear on MuchMusic wearing a tie-dyed T-shirt, waving a Bob Marley album and pleading to anyone who might listen to ‘Legalize it!’
Just as the nation was getting used to the idea of the PM appearing next on Canadian Idol, banging out his version of AC/DC’s ‘Highway to Hell,“ Harper revealed yet another jaw dropping admission on October 22 at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce Convention in Toronto, when asked his opinion of Canadian news;
For a Prime Minister and a political party that has made photo opportunities into the kind of meticulously managed stage craft worthy of Broadway that Mr. Harper and his minions have become famous for, the very idea that the star of these productions does not even bother to watch the end result, nor the reaction to them by the media or the public, is simply amazing.
What then, one wonders, is the purpose of maintaining such an authoritarian grip on the image of the party and the PM if the main attraction doesn’t even trust the media he presumably designs it all for to present that image in a responsible manner?
When pressed about which American news programming he watches, Harper declined to comment on any specifics, almost as though he were more concerned about the reaction to his preferences among U.S. journalists and networks than he was those of his own country.
While these events seem unrelated, it’s difficult to reconcile the image of the PM belting out John Lennon lyrics to a bemused and astonished gathering of business scions and socialites, and his nonchalant confession in front of the nations’ media that Canadian news is not worthy of his attention.
The Prime Minister it seems, is a far more interesting individual than he has led us to believe.
Are Canadians now to expect further admissions to include his penchant for zebra stripped underwear versus boxers, or that he and his wife stroll 24 Sussex in the nude, or that he doesn’t stoop and scoop when walking the family dog?
There is still a week and a half left in the month; here’s hoping.
Copyright JQM 2009
Friday, 16 October 2009
-
CANADA AND AFGHANISTAN: THE CLOCK IS TICKING
The Canadian combat commitment in Afghanistan is scheduled to end in 2011. Prime Minister Stephen Harper has recently been empathic about the date, stating ‘"Well, let me be very clear, Canada's military mission in Afghanistan will end in 2011.’
With the recent developments following the highly disputed Afghan elections in August 2009, (the results of which have this week been revised by the Independent Elections Committee to conclude that President Hamid Karzai did not legitimately receive the 50% of votes necessary to avoid a run-off election, due to the vast number of unlawfully cast votes that were overturned by the committee in their investigation of widespread fraud allegations), Canada’s deadline has come under increasing pressure from the United States, which is seeking to maintain this vital alliance to their military coalition.
This political pressure is not likely to ease, but to intensify, as the date for Canada’s draw down approaches.
The war has never been popular in Canada, nor has it received wide support throughout NATO, particularly among populations like ours which foresaw very little domestic or international security arising from the US led invasion and subsequent occupation of Afghanistan.
What little support there was, has been effectively eroded by the consistent charges of systemic corruption within the Karzai government. What NATO ministers and diplomats are reluctant to voice, but which their constituents are increasingly impressing upon them, is that Western nations will not continue to prop up what many Afghans consider a US implanted government which does not represent their interests, and has come to symbolize the inherent dangers of foreign powers intervening and interfering with the sovereignty of their country.
Prime Minister Harper’s minority government has not been immune to this reality, which is likely the only reason they have not succumbed to US pressure to maintain a military presence in Afghanistan after 2011, which has led many Conservative critics to ask, what might their position have been if Mr. Harper enjoyed the luxury of a majority government?
The multiple bombings in Pakistan this month have only exacerbated the immense pressures that are bearing down on the region. The deposed Taliban and elements of Al Queda have sheltered in Pakistan since the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2002. Given ample time to reconstitute and strengthen during the period the Bush administration choose to divert its attention and resources to the ill fated Iraq war, it is clear that they used the intervening years to formulate an effective and ruthless strategy of weakening Pakistani support for the war in Afghanistan with a concentrated series of suicide bombings that have killed hundreds and left Pakistan in a state of virtual civil war.
All of which has made President Obama’s decision to delay immediate additional troop requests to Afghanistan seem cautious and wise, but has made Canada’s decision not to renew its combat role appear prescient and sage.
With virtually no good options available, the most prudent advice would seem to be come home while you still can.
Copyright JQM 2009
Monday, 12 October 2009
-
CAN YA DIG IT? TOP TEN 1970’S POP CULTURE ICONS BABY
Groovy man, right on.
#10) JACKIE O
Already famous as a former First Lady of the U.S. and widow of President John F. Kennedy, Jaqueline Bouvier Kennedy created a media shockwave with her marriage to one of the worlds’ richest men, Greek shipping magnate and homunculus extraordinaire Aristotle Onassis, in 1968, just months after the assassination of her brother in law Robert Kennedy, and became tabloid superstar Jackie O. Thus resumed the public fascination with a woman already beloved for her glamour, style and sophistication, and now presumably because people wondered endlessly about how she could possibly get down with a shrunken troll like Onassis, who had been romantically linked with numerous famous women, including opera Diva Maria Callas, whom he ignobly dumped for Jackie. The Kennedy mystique went from Camelot to gossip central as Jackie’s every movement was scrutinized for even a hint of titillation, as she became the most photographed woman in the world in the first half of the decade.
#9) All IN THE FAMILY
Based on a successful British sitcom called Bless This House, the emergence of Archie Bunker and his racist, sexist brand of humor in 1971 hit America like a giant beer belch, and the burps kept on coming. Caroll O’Conner, Jean Stapleton, Rob Reiner and Sally Struthers so perfectly captured the extremes of an American society coming to terms with a rapidly changing world at home and abroad, that it immediately became one of the most popular programs in the history of television. Words like ‘Dingbat,’ ‘Meathead’ and ‘Little Goil’ quickly became the insults of choice in schoolyards across North America. The episode where Sammy Davis Jr. kisses Archie is a classic.
#8) KOJAK
Telly Savalas starred as New York police detective Lt. Theo Kojak, and single handedly made bald, big nosed Greek actors a hot commodity. In an age where virtually anyone could be sexy, even he couldn’t have imagined that he might be considered one of them. His portrayal of an off beat cop who had a penchant for lollipops, overcoats and pithy one liners was a real departure from the standard straight talking, ultra White cop that was the norm. Somehow the show, which ran for 5 years from 1973-78 had a surprisingly large audience of women who found the dead pan line ‘Who loves ya baby?’ irresistible.
#7) CHARLIES’ ANGELS
This show is almost exclusively famous for the introduction of Farrah Fawcett, but is also one of the campiest tv concepts ever to get off the ground. A combination of sex appeal, women’s lib and over the top sexism, the idea of 3 former police officers giving up their mundane, going nowhere roles for the exciting, glamorous and dangerous world of private detectives, was an immediate smash. The first season had the Angels appearing in a variety of form flattering and revealing outfits, which explained why they were constantly solving murders at the beach or a beauty pageant, or why 3 young, attractive women would be at the beck and call of a faceless older weirdo that had a penchant for sending them into danger while he and Bosley stayed out of the way, presumably because even then perverted voyeurs just weren’t cool.
#6) EVEL KNIEVEL
Today, with every teenager on Earth likely making millions from death defying motorcycle or skateboard stunts, the idea of a middle aged, leather clad daredevil seems like an old Simpson’s episode, which it later was. But in the 1970’s, Evel Knievel was the face of cool for millions of adolescent boys and jaded, pot bellied men who could only dream of the thrill of sailing a motorcycle over 15 school buses then crashing to the ground at 120 MPH so that you could feel every bone in your body break into pieces in super slo-motion. The ultimate event was his infamous ‘Snake River Canyon Jump’ which saw him evoke the spirit of the Lord no less than 30 times in his pre-jump interview with Jim McKay on ABC’s Wide World of Sports, which carried the spectacle live, only to have Evel curse like a drunken sailor after emerging from his wrecked rocket vehicle after the aborted jump, when his parachute opened prematurely and sent him hurtling to the canyon floor in what promised to be TV’s first live suicide. I still have the Evel Kneival Stunt set toy for all you Ebay freaks.
#5) SATURDAY NIGHT FEVER
What can be said? The film that made John Travolta a superstar, introduced the Bee Gees to an entirely new generation of fans, and made Disco music THE sound of the age. Travolta was already a fan favorite on ‘Welcome Back Kotter,’ but this movie made him a household name. The Bee Gees were already one of pop music’s most successful acts, but their contributions to the soundtrack became their biggest selling singles and the album replaced FleetWood Mac’s ‘Rumors’ as the best selling record in history until 'Thriller.' Bell bottom jeans, silver disco balls, pulsating music and line dancing were suddenly the hottest things on Earth, and created the Rock vs. Disco war that has raged ever since like a Disco Inferno. How deep is your love when you should be dancing?
#4) THE ABC AFTER SCHOOL SPECIAL
Teenagers today wouldn’t believe it, but there was actually a time when no one gave a decrepit rat turd about what they thought, what they did or what impact they might have on society. Then miraculously, some suit at ABC decided that kids had money to spend and were possibly going to have even more to spend if only there was a tv show that could hook them into watching ads about running shoes and acne medication while making them feel important. The concept was to appeal to what issues teens were dealing with; drugs, alcohol, sexuality, peer pressure and conformity, and make it ‘hip’ and ‘keen.’ Starring the likes of ‘70’s teen luminaries like Lance Kerwin and Kristy McNichol, these attempts at ‘realistic’ teen drama were notable for their utterly phony, Hollywood notions of what teenagers were like, which only made them that much more attractive to the scores of actual teens who got drunk and stoned while watching them with a mixture of contempt and uncontrollable laughter.
#3) THE JACKSON FIVE
Long before he got weird and carved himself up, Michael Jackson was the epitome of cool for a generation of kids of all races. He and his brothers were talented, world recognized and funky bad asses at a time when kids didn’t control the universe. A string of top ten hits, their own Saturday morning cartoon and later their own prime time tv show were just some of the accomplishments that made my brothers and I worship these guys as if they were part of our own family. I defy anyone to watch this clip and not wish they were MJ for even a split second at this age; talk about cool, you don’t even know.
#2) BURT REYNOLDS
Films like Shamus, The Longest Yard and Smokey and The Bandit established the Burtinator as one of Hollywood’s biggest box office stars, and sent legions of women swooning at his increasingly irritating penchant for wearing ever tighter ass hugger jeans. Just when you thought he would spontaneously combust for sleeping with literally every young starlet in America, Burt broke the mold when he began a serious relationship with Dinah Shore, at the time the most watched daytime talk show host on television, a respectable Southern belle who was 20 years his senior. Their romance was the talk of the town, until Burt dumped her for his Smokey and the Bandit co-star Sally Field, thus fulfilling the macho dreams of balding, married men everywhere, who wanted to get it on with their wives' best friend and the local nun, probably at the same time.
#1) MUHAMMAD ALI
Talk about having it all; a specimen of physical beauty, Olympic champion, a committed social activist, the only 3 time Heavyweight boxing title holder in history and the baddest mothereffer on the planet, Ali encompassed the absolute epitome of old school masculinity and superstardom. People forget that he was one of the original rappers with his infamous rhymes or contemptuously thought his knockout round predictions were just bravado and luck. Stripped of his Heavyweight boxing title at the height of his career for refusing to serve in the U.S. army during the Vietnam war, Ali famously remarked, “I ain’t got no quarrel with them Viet Cong…they never called me nigger.” His 3 epic fights with Smoking Joe Frazier as part of his comeback were some of the most punishing displays of physical prowess in the sport. After the second fight, Ali said ‘It’s the closest I’ve come to dying.’ After Frazier lost the title he’d won from Ali to the undefeated George Foreman, who knocked Joe down 6 times in 2 rounds, the stage was set for ‘The Rumble in the Jungle’ in Kinshasa, Zaire, Ali vs. Foreman for the undisputed Heavyweight crown. After employing his famous ‘Rope a Dope’ tactic for the entire fight, which meant allowing the younger, more powerful Foreman to use him as a punching bag, Ali scored the most famous knockout in boxing history when the exhausted Foreman took a flurry of punches that sent him reeling to the canvas in the 8th round. For those who only know Ali as the victim of Parkinson’s disease, likely brought about from boxing, the true legend of the man is the stuff of Hollywood.
- browse entries:
- older »
Top Tags - Weblog
Connect
Weblog Archives
About Me
-
Gil Jarreau; journalist, broadcaster, pundit, sage of our times, the last of a bygone breed that dared challenge the status quo, and defiantly altered it by sheer strength of will, and some questionably legal tactics.













































Chatboard (0)